Our case studies highlight how we translate complex evidence into actionable insights. Each project showcases the challenges faced, the methods applied, and the impact achieved.
Regulatory and HTA bodies now require robust comparative evidence, yet for novel therapies like CAR-T, randomized controlled trials are often not feasible. Because ZUMA-5 was a single-arm trial, an external control arm and statistical models that emulate clinical trials were needed.
With nearly 40 million people living with HIV globally, mounting evidence pointed to the benefits of dolutegravir (TLD) over efavirenz (TLE). WHO needed to determine whether the evidence base supported switching regimens from a public health perspective.
In a crowded therapeutic landscape, establishing unmet need and articulating the value of new therapies is critical for payer decision-making.
The following are a collection of recent papers and pivotal papers